Read the paper (PDF) : A simple alternative to Special and General Relativity
Albert Einstein
Back in 1905, Albert Einstein unveiled his famous Special Relativity. But, is it necessary?
Relativistic effects do not need Relativity in order to receive full theoretical coverage. At the same time, Quantum effects now can be viewed in a different light. The premise of physical matter possessing information content, yields relativistic effects, and is turning waves of probability into the real waves of physical matter.


What is the speed of light and what is Faster Than Light (FTL)
Why the term "speed of light" is a misnomer in a new interpretation.


What is the new theory about?
It's about physical matter having information content. It's simpler than Relativity, because it rests on a notion of locality, a simpler and more general point of theoretical departure. 

Welcome to Information Physics!
Learn more about why we think that effects such as time dilation are not best served with the theory of Relativity, and why examining the information content of physical matter is a simpler and more general approach.  The result is a possibility of travelling to nearby stars in a much shorter period of time, with the level of technology conceptually similar to what we have today.    -Serge Miatovich, Master of Science in Computer Science and El. Eng.
Kinematic time dilation without Relativity
This is so-called "Gamma" factor, as derived in Special Relativity. We show it to be a corner-case of a general equation, just as we do with the equations of General Relativity. It can be derived without Relativity and even the notion of light.
Albert Einstein in 1921
Gravitational time dilation without Relativity, light, gravity, mass and the first principles
See it derived from the premise of physical matter possessing information content.

The Proof
Is there a proof already that corroborates the findings of the new theory?


The Idea
We focus on the following:
   1. We consider physical matter to be an information container, regardless of its underlying physical nature.
   2. We explicitly remove Relativity (Galilean and Einstein's) from any role in formulating physical laws.

The new theory simplifies the fundamentals of physics.

Theory studying information content of physical matter is an alternative to Special and General Relativity, while reducing to them as corner cases. It comes with new predictions calling for experimental coverage, that may lead to practical Faster-Than-Light interstellar travel in the near future.
Is Einstein's Relativity not proven right?
Yes, but only under specific circumstances. Researchers have been looking in all the places where it holds, and ignored those where it doesn't.


Einstein was wrong and Interstellar travel is possible now: True or False?
There is a straightforward way to find out. The deviations from Einstein's theory are in the places we have not looked for.

Main Proof Experiments Paper Q&A FTL New Physics Why this? Analogy Einstein Wrong?
Speed of Light  Warp Drive It From Bit About FREE Book Contact
Short "Whiteboard" Sketch of mathematics
See the highlights of mathematics that produces time dilation without Relativity and without the notion of light, while at the same time, predicting the possibility of Faster Than Light motion in some cases.


What are the problems we address in the theory?
There are a number of practical and conceptual physical issues.

An Analogy and a-ha moments
Like analogies? Here is one to help understand the idea.

Why focus on information?
All the physical laws we know of, tell us that quantifiable values are the sole driver of those laws. Without intrinsically having certain properties, no physical system would evolve into anything else but pure chaos. These properties, or values, in the final abstraction are nothing but information.

Regardless of how this information is used in natural processes, there is one fact that is indisputable: it is used. Information is used on a most fundamental level in Nature to convey matter from chaos to a degree of order. We know of no other way in which a natural conveyance of physical systems unfolds. There is no magic wand that makes them run. This is so, even if we would think of natural systems being mathematics with physical consequences.

In the end, though, the mathematics and the labels we use to describe physical matter and their interactions, are nothing but an acknowledgement that physical world is one in which everything unwinds by means of information use.

"It From Bit" and Relativity
Informational approach has been around for some time. Why is this time different?

Warp Drive
Is warp drive possible? Given seemingly insurmountable problems with the idea, perhaps we should change the conversation and ask the question: are we overcomplicating things and not utilizing the obvious?

On the Interstellar Travel: A book on Information Physics
Read the FREE book that presents the theory in popular terms, or click the image on the left.  You can download the book as a PDF file. The full paper can be found below (as a PDF) or from the main menu (as a web page).
From a practical standpoint, one consequence of the theory is that practical interstellar travel is possible without wormholes, exotic matter or enormous energies.

The diagram on the right summarizes this in an approximation involving two isolated objects: a massive point of departure (such as Earth) and a departing object of significant mass (such as a ship).

In a nutshell,  just as Relativity generalized Newtonian physics, so does Information Physics go beyond Relativity.

More specifically, just as Relativity is evidently different from Newtonian physics at high speeds, so is Information Physics different from Relativity away from large mass, such as Earth.

What diagram above says is that FTL (faster-than-light) motion is impossible near large mass such as Earth. However, far from large mass, FTL is possible.

Consider this: the FTL trip far from massive bodies has never been tried, and literally no one on this planet can say the above claim is wrong. Contemporary science assumes that Relativity will work anywhere, even though we only a had a chance to thoroughly and directly test it only nearby large bodies in our Solar system. That is a spectacular assumption, one based on unquestioning faith in Einstein's Relativity.

A steady stream of confirmations of Einstein's Relativity is solidly built around the circumstances under which it always holds. At the same time, evidence that it does not hold is essentially ignored. And those situations under which it may not hold, such as what we described above, are not even remotely of interest to experimental physicists today. It is a vicious circle of confirmation bias, where only a "black swan" event, i.e. something unexpected or accidental, may serve to turn the wheels of progress. Let's hope.
Einstein's Relativity may not hold in deep space exactly the same way as it does here on Earth, as contemporary scientists assume. Insisting on assumptions of such enormous magnitude based on indirect evidence have often been proven wrong.